Skip to content

Conversation

@jonathanedey
Copy link
Collaborator

@jonathanedey jonathanedey commented Jan 19, 2026

This pr also removes the unused release tweet action.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @jonathanedey, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the GPG keyname configured within the GitHub Actions resources. This is a routine maintenance task to ensure the continuous and secure operation of automated processes that rely on GPG for signing, such as artifact releases or code verification.

Highlights

  • GPG Keyname Update: The gpg.keyname property within the .github/resources/settings.xml file has been updated. The old key 0A05D8FAD4287A36C53BE07714D6B82AEB1DD39C has been replaced with 40232A3CABB94E75E654F6A973E5C093C01673CB.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the GPG key name in the Maven settings file for GitHub Actions. My review suggests an improvement to enhance security and maintainability by externalizing the GPG key name into an environment variable, similar to how the passphrase is handled. This would prevent hardcoding configuration values and make key management more flexible.

@jonathanedey jonathanedey added the release:stage Stage a release candidate label Jan 20, 2026
Copy link
Member

@lahirumaramba lahirumaramba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release:stage Stage a release candidate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants